THE 300

THE 300

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Does God Hate Evolution? (Part 2)

In Part 1 we looked at some of the scientific claims made by evolutionists, versus the actual appearance and evidence that this universe was designed to host life, and that life is also designed. Now we will look at what a belief in evolution will produce in individuals, in society and in the world. We can look at the spiritual origin of evolutionary theory, as everything in this material universe is an analogue of something in the spiritual universe.

In fact Biblical imagery is misunderstood, especially apocalyptic writings, because what we see here in our 4 dimensions of space-time, are seen to be living beings in a spiritual universe, or the actions of those beings in regards to the earth. Another way to think of it is that the spiritual universe is more than here, as Milton (Paradise Lost) depicts in his writings. The spiritual universe contains this universe, you might think of it as having more dimensions. So then a lie in the spirit universe is alive, it is a person, as Christ observed; “Satan was a liar from the beginning, and he is a lie.”

One of the differences between the spiritual “realm,” and this material “realm,” is that you cannot hide what you are in the spirit universe. If you are bad, then you look bad, you smell bad, your voice is an unbearable shriek, and you reek of corruption. Not so here on earth where deception reigns. This is proven in nearly every election cycle in America and elsewhere, and in nearly every revolution in the earth. The people keep expecting saviors; instead they get tyrants, savages, egomaniacs, idiots as their leaders. Many times the people believe in those leaders as if they are hypnotized, they help them to gain prominence by their love of deception.

Revelation 16:12-14 Then the sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river Euphrates, and its water was dried up, so that the way of the kings from the east might be prepared. And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs coming out of the mouth of the dragon, out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are spirits of demons, performing signs, which go out to the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.

This first spirit, represented as a frog is seen as a living thing, issuing out of the mouth of the dragon (Satan). It goes into the earth as a 3rd part of a system of deception to bring about the great closing wars of human history, of which we are nearly at an end. It is from the mouth of the dragon, because this is the essence of Satanic thought: Satan’s thinking is that he is the same kind of being as God, he is at war with God, he is in competition with God, he ultimately hates God.

Satan does not think he was created, something in being an angel must demand faith also, since they were created in the eternal realm, before time was created, they have no knowledge of beginning. Satan must have nurtured a grudge while serving God as the Bible depicts he was greatest of the angels, the most beautiful, granted the greatest access and communion with God, the greatest being God had created. Finally his smoldering resentment erupted probably ages ago into full fledged rebellion and war and Satan managed to enlist a third of all the created angels with him. However he lost that war and has been imprisoned here on earth along with the angels that rebelled.

This deception comes into the earth, and it does not come until nearly the end of human history, it functions to help separate men into two camps, those that believe God is the creator, and those that do not believe God is the creator. It is shown as a frog, because frogs are prolific and found in rivers and streams, and pools; this deception would find its way into the flow of human thought and would multiply. This depicts what happened when Darwin published Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859. It turned the scientific world upside down, within a few decades within the elites and sophisticates of Western Culture it became the predominate worldview. Lets look at a few of the comments about this deception:

Clark H. Pinnock from “Set forth Your Case.”

The myth of Evolution is so entwined in the current world view that its absurdities are seldom even noticed. It ought to be apparent to the casual observer of the history of science since Darwin, that the theory he propounded, far from becoming better established, is becoming shakier with every passing year.

If you ignore for a moment the brain washing of magazines with a Time-Life mentality, and listen to the experts in the various fields, you would soon realize that the data on which this grand hypothesis depends are slender indeed, and capable of a dozen different constructions. . . .The reason Evolution is believed and taught as a fact is not due to the evidence for it, but rather due to the need for it

When Sir Julian Huxley published his Evolution in Action, a kind of ex cathedra pronouncement on the subject of natural selection, Sir James Gray reviewed the book in the English journal Nature, noting the fervor with which Huxley "preaches his gospel." Gray put it this way:

Darwinian orthodoxy demands implicit faith in the efficacy of natural selection operating on chance mutations. Subscribe to this, and all doubts and hesitations disappear; question it and be forever lost. The case for orthodoxy can seldom have been stated with greater cogency and enthusiasm than by Dr. Julian Huxley in "Evolution in Action." A few readers, perhaps rather pagan in their outlook, may think it a little strange that, if the case is quite so strong as they are asked to believe, it should still be necessary to argue the merits of natural selection with almost evangelistic vigor.

The following is an excerpt from Evolution: An Irrational Faith by Arthur C. Custance

Natural selection is a meaningless concept unless it leads to the survival of the fittest and to the elimination of the unfit. The fitness of all forms of life (apart from man), by and large, impresses the naturalist everywhere he looks. It impressed Darwin. It could be evidence of the hand of God; or it could be evidence of some natural law which sees to it that all unfit forms are eliminated, constantly, unfailingly, being given no chance to perpetuate their kind. Darwin thought he had discovered this mechanism, the struggle to survive leading to the survival of the fittest. And the very temper of the times in which he lived prepared the public to welcome a concept which seemed to justify the ruthless exploitation of the weak by the strong, a philosophy deeply engrained as a consequence of the Industrial Revolution. In his autobiography, Andrew Carnegie, who made his fortune in steel, described as follows his conversion to evolution on reading Darwin and Spencer:

I remember that light came as in a flood and all was clear. Not only had I got rid of theology and the supernatural but I had found the truth of evolution. "All is well since all grows better," became my motto, my true source of comfort. Man was not created with an instinct for his own degradation, but from the lower he had risen to the higher forms. Nor is there any conceivable end to his march to perfection. His face is turned to the light; he stands in the sun and looks upward.

Ashley Montagu observed in connection with Big Business that John D. Rockefeller (who certainly should have known better) said, "The growth of a large business is merely the survival of the fittest. . . . This is not an evil tendency in business. It is merely the working out of a law of nature and a law of God."

Montagu commented: Darwinism was offered as no mere apology. It was more positive than that, it was a validation, a biological justification for competition. This doctrine has become part of the behavioral equipment, the system of overt beliefs, of almost everyone in the western world today. . . . “
This view of life is completely false. Yet it largely motivates the conduct of most persons in the western world. And it has brought man into the sorry state of personal, interpersonal, and international conflict in which he finds himself today.

It seemed so entirely proper, and the arguments which Darwin used to support the concept so very reasonable, and the evidence which he selected to illustrate how it works in Nature so convincing, that very few people paused long enough to ask whether it was really true.

In retrospect, we can see now that many of the catch-phrases with which he bolstered his thesis ought to have been challenged from the very beginning. Is Nature really in a constant state of warfare? Do animals over-populate the territory they occupy so that many of them are constantly on the border of starvation and only the very fit survive? Is it true that animals are entirely "selfish" and that they are neither altruistic nor interdependent?

Do only the fit survive? The fact is that, little by little, a more careful examination of what goes on in Nature has shown that the answer to every one of these questions is negative. It is the object of this Paper to give some of the evidence now available that Nature does not necessarily eliminate or "select out" the unfit, a circumstance which naturalists in their desire to find a mechanism for evolution for a long while tended to overlook.

Nature is not in a state of constant warfare. Animals do not under normal circumstances over-populate the territory they occupy. Cooperation and interdependence in the community life of animals is not a rare thing, but seems rather to be an essential part of the very fabric of it. The whole concept of natural selection, which is still so fundamental to current evolutionary theory, only makes sense if we assume that it eliminates the unfit and that this process of elimination results from struggle of some sort. But what is becoming increasingly apparent is that there is as much co-operation as there is struggle in Nature, and indeed probably more. The unfit often survive, and when they do it is not infrequently because members of their own species actually assist them to do so. (End of Custance excerpt)

Just a few days ago Drudge had the story of a dog that was caught on the traffic cams in Argentina running out into traffic and pulling its injured companion (another dog) from the traffic. There are many stories of animals of different species adopting the young of other species. There are many home videos showing animals that you would think to be enemies, living together, playing together, and it has all the appearance that some of these animals love each other.

Though dedicated evolutionists will deny a link to Eugenics and evolutionary thinking, there are not a few books that draw that link all the way to Hitler:

The War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race by Edwin Black

The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism by Stefan Kuhl.

The Unfit: The History of a Bad Idea by Elof Axel Carlson

G.K. Chesterton was a co-author of the book called, Eugenics and Other Evils: An Argument Against the Scientifically Organized State.

And the book mentioned on the Ben Stein Expelled documentary, From Darwin to Hitler by Richard Weikart.

Now I had said in part I that God has allowed evolutionary theory to take root in the earth to become a great tree under which scientific atheism can flourish, to take men back to the very beginning of our fall, to expose and expunge the Satanic thinking imparted to all humanity when we accepted his lie that we would not die, and we would be like God, and know good and evil. Well we have known good and evil, but we never became like God, and we do die, we die spiritually every day we accept this lie and live in separation from our creator.

To break this cycle we must reject evolutionary thinking, we must identify it in our daily life and resist and reject the competition Satan has introduced. In fact the manifestation of the Sons of God it speaks about in Romans 8 who break the curse of futility on creation will learn to stop competing with each other. You must learn to bless. This is not a do-gooder, new age phony spirituality. This only comes about because you have suffered under the futility of competition. You refuse the outlook of limited resources, for if you channel the blessings of God the resources will be miraculously multiplied.

It is at this time that God is releasing the Law of Harvest upon the earth as an immediate enforceable law. From this time onward you will be blessed or cursed by what comes out of your mouth and spirit. Just as the nations have been destroyed by their actions to one another in the stone cut out of the mountain without hands in Daniel’s vision, now the cycle, the crushing of that stone reaches a personal individual level, as it continues on to grind the remainder of the broken up pieces of that statue to powder.

This is not a slow process coming on the earth; it started the day after Saddam Hussein was captured, in the timing of God the cycle had finished; now it reaches a second stage where men cannot hide behind national, political, racial, ideological or religious excuses for their mistreatment of one another. If you learn (and learning is painful) to bless when all within you would rather curse, would rather send back hatred for hatred, then you will break this spirit of futility on yourself, and will be a part of breaking it on the whole earth.

This is a key to what many Christians have found a mystery in their walk with God. How do you actually acquire His divine nature? He released it to us upon the cross, in great suffering. You acquire that divine nature at the gateway of suffering, we are not good, we do not learn, or discover some hidden goodness in us. We finally suffer so much in our rebellion to our creator that we cry out, “what must we do to be saved?” Only then do you drop the human prerogative to move in hate, in un-forgiveness, in competition.

At first it is a struggle to break a lifetime addiction of moving in your own will, in your own responses and you set yourself to bless, even if evil is being done to you. What will happen? I think you will see your enemies will either sense that blessing, and want more and change from what they are doing, or they will be driven into madness because that blessing is powerful, and filled with the intent of God. Even Paul noted the principle of divine judgment in blessing, he instructs, “love your enemies; as such you will heap burning coals of fire upon their heads.”

This is real, not some gooey human love that is unable to affect or change anyone or anything. This changes you, because you cannot bless with ulterior motives, you cannot smuggle in the idea that, “hey if I bless that jerk, then burning coals will be upon his head.” No you just bless…the coals take care of themselves. What is it to you if the person repents? Much better as he has ceased to be your enemy and may even be your friend. If he does not repent? Now he is not your enemy, you are not positioned as his enemy, now God intervenes directly, before if you were in a psychic shootout, who would God deal with? Who is the most wrong? The one that started it or the one that keeps it going?

All of the careful building up of the universe, then the earth, then life, then human culture have led up to this point, to the creation of human spirits in the image of the divine. Ironic that the greatest denial of God as the creator is coming at the very time that His creative power will be most on display in the manifestation of human beings that acquire His divine nature.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Does God Hate Evolution? (Part I)

Evolutionary theory gained prominence in these last 150 years by permission, no actually by direction of God. What you say? Yes that is true, not that evolutionary theory as it is taught is true, as it is actually the greatest lie ever introduced in the earth. It is the original lie of the serpent in the Garden. Where Satan convinces Eve that God was lying and was actually blocking her from being like Him. Satan is what he is because he is in competition with God.

Satan had always harbored a suspicion that God is another being of the same order, of the same kind as himself, but has somehow managed to convince other beings that they are all created, that God himself is the only non-caused existent being, the fount of the eternal. Never having been created, something which cannot be understood, no matter how hard you try, by the human mind. Just as math instructs us there are things the human mind cannot really understand, such as infinity exists between any two numbers, and infinity stretches out in an unending series of numbers. That the constant of PI has a series of non repeating decimal numbers. And many other mathematical concepts that point to the unknown, the uncreated, the eternal.

The process of our creation is to make us know beyond what angels can understand that we are created beings. God will not suffer another rebellion in his creation where so much pain and damage was done by beings that should have accepted by faith that they were created. Most of the angelic beings did accept this fact; or rather truth, but Satan and one third of the “created,” angels did not. There has to be something in the angelic intellect that can be self-deceived that they are not created, I suppose philosophers could contemplate such things. I suspect it has to do with the nature of eternity that angels have no sense of beginning as they were not created as we are in a universe that has the dimension of time.

Thus the need for a created universe with a beginning to be the stage for beings that are created in time, we know we have a beginning, and death informs us we have an end. Yet the promise of God, if we learn our lessons is that we will graduate to the realm of the eternal. Forever marked in our beings as knowing we were created, but we were then redeemed to live in the eternal.

Scientific evidence is nearly overwhelming now that the universe seems to be peculiarly designed for first conscious life to be sustained and more specifically for human life to appear. This is called the anthropic principle and is probably best summed up by the former atheist and Ph.D. in English and American literature Patrick Glenn in his book God: The Evidence "... the Anthropic Principle says that the seemingly arbitrary and unrelated constants in physics have one strange thing in common--these are precisely the values you need if you want to have a universe capable of producing life."

The counter argument to this is that “Well we are here, so of course the universe must have had all these conditions and constants in order for us to be here to write about Anthropic Principle." Peculiarly this is the same sort of argument at the base of evolutionary theory, that repeatedly uses the argument that; “we must have evolved, because we are here and we cannot find any acceptable theory for the variety of species that exist and have existed on the earth." However evolutionists reject out of hand any other explaination, such as special creation, as they protest they cannot know or measure the supernatural. At first glance valid arguments within the narrow confines of the scientific method. However the existence of life is a special case to science, since there are only two recognized methods that human beings can even think of for the existence of life from inorganic material.

Either matter had within itself organizing principles to produce organic compounds, and eventually the assembling together of the incredibly complex chemical machinery within a single living cell, all prodded down the incredible path to life by fortuitous, one in a trillions upon trillions of small chance that all conditions would be met in early seas, just the right amount of radiation as a power source, just the right compounds available in the right concentrations. Yet this is to happen by random (no directing intelligence or supernatural power allowed) and this should in the almost incomprehensible eons of time finally have happened. Once this original task has taken place, the theory of evolution is now used to explain all the plethora of life on this planet, from one celled animals, to whales, to great Sequoias, to dinosaurs, to ants, to you and me.

First, in my opinion this theory shirks its first duty and ought to address the existence of life from the inorganic, since the accepted theory of the existence of this universe shows the progression since the big bang of first only energy, then the congealing of some of that energy into matter, which converts in stars to the multitude of elements of which all things, including life is made. This true evolution of the cosmos is very good science and hardly disputed except by young earth creationists, and perhaps some crackpots here and there. Evidence for the evolution of stars, and galaxies, and finally planetary systems, comes forward in the scientific world day by day, some ideas change here and there, but the grand outline is pretty well known.

Yet when devotees of evolutionary theory try to address how even the first cells arose from the inorganic they look at the math, the possibility that life could have started by chance and they nearly throw up their hands in defeat. Choosing to concoct ridiculous theories that do nothing to answer the problem, it just pushes the creation of life to other planets and spread by alien races, or comets seeding the planets. Still no answer how life arose on the first alien planet, as the probabilities and the math presents the same problem on any planet that is fit for life in all the galaxies in the universe.

This theory called Panspermia was put forth by Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, who are astronomers, trying to help their biologist brethren who are faced with the fact that if all the conditions that life would need to begin as a single cell in primordial seas had existed, then the chances that a single cell would have been assembled and “come to life,” is calculated to be: 1 x 101,057,800 That is One with over one million zeros. To put this number in perspective, it would take 11 full pages of magazine type to print this number.

To make this even more clear it is calculated that the number of all the atoms in the universe, in all stars, planets, in all the galaxies is at the high end 1 x 1081 The number one with eighty one zeros. This is such a huge number for one cell to have come into existence, that even if our universe was thousands of times the size of the one we observe and live in and it was filled with the inorganic elements necessary for a single cell to form it would just never happen. In other words life had to have an outside directing force, intelligence, or it, would never have come into existence.

Hoyle and Wickramasinghe explained it this way by limiting the problem in just creating a protein (Proteins are the building blocks of cells). In this instance they are talking about creating a single enzymes (a form of protein used in cells for manufacturing and construction)

Some 1000-2000 enzymes sustain life, and, surprisingly, the variation of amino acid sequences in these enzymes from one species to another is, overall, rather minor, noted Hoyle and Wickramasinghe. “A number of key positions on these chains are occupied by almost invariable amino acids.” The two astronomers scoffed at the “primeval soup” paradigm proposed by Oparinians and Darwinians, which proposes that twenty biologically important amino acids in equal concentrations floated in the primitive soup until struck by lightening to form life. (11) Hoyle and Wickramasinghe considered ten sites per enzyme as crucial for proper biological functioning. What is the number of trial assemblies needed to produce just one functioning enzyme? The answer is in excess of (20)10 , i.e., 20 times 20 times 20 times 20, etc., 40 times The number of trials needed to assemble one functioning enzyme in the primeval soup exceeds the number of all the atoms in all the stars in the whole visible universe, even before the tenth power is reached! declared Hoyle and Wickramasinghe. (12)

Now I say come to life because life, no matter what it is made of is something totally different than even the highest ordered matter, such as crystals. It has to be seen that unlike inorganic matter, life exhibits will, purpose, self direction, and by minimal definition it must be able to reproduce. This is something all together different than nuclear processes directed by physical laws set into motion within the first fractions of a second in the big bang. This is more like a stage was assembled from and by non-living matter, in our analogy we can even say matter had within itself the properties that it will eventually in a hierarchical manner via physical laws inherent in that matter assemble itself into a stage.

But life is the actors on that stage, from whence came these actors? They are not directed by the same physical constraints of inorganic matter. Put a fan on the stage to simulate wind, and the actors by force of will and by mind directing muscles can walk against that wind to do as they will, they are above these physical laws. They contain within themselves a whole new set of laws, far beyond the electro-chemical processes our evolutionists insist must be an emergent property of matter when arranged in sufficiently complex hierarchies, and this emergent property is life, or rather produces, creates life. Do you see the problem? No matter how you talk about forces that give rise to life you are nearly forced to use the words, "create," produce," "bring forth." All words or phrases that invoke a directing something or someone.

Following is just some of the constants set within matter and energy just to get the stage set via the slow, and I will say careful evolution of the universe. This is true evolution, set in motion by God, with all the laws inherent within matter and energy that produced galaxies, stars, gravity, and atoms. Eventually after stars cooked up heavier elements and some of them blew up in super novas and spread those elements into space for second and third generation stars to form that had planetary systems made of these heavier elements, elements that have to have very certain and specific properties for life to exist. The evolutionist plays a shell game with the novice, and with those that are educated in our secular humanistic schools, they put the laws of the cosmos and the development of stars and planetary systems under the cup where they say life evolves. Not so fast. Let us first understand just some of the exacting precision needed to even have the stage where life can act out its drama. It is far more complex and precise than the uninitiated is told.

Gravity is roughly 1039 times weaker than electromagnetism. If gravity had been 1033 times weaker than electromagnetism, "stars would be a billion times less massive and would burn a million times faster."

The nuclear weak force is 1028 times the strength of gravity. Had the weak force been slightly weaker, all the hydrogen in the universe would have been turned to helium (making water impossible, for example). A stronger nuclear strong force (by as little as 2 percent) would have prevented the formation of protons--yielding a universe without atoms. Decreasing it by 5 percent would have given us a universe without stars.

If the difference in mass between a proton and a neutron were not exactly as it is--roughly twice the mass of an electron--then all neutrons would have become protons or vice versa. Say good-bye to chemistry as we know it--and to life.

The very nature of water--so vital to life--is something of a mystery (a point noticed by one of the forerunners of anthropic reasoning in the nineteenth century, Harvard biologist Lawrence Henderson). Unique amongst the molecules, water is lighter in its solid than liquid form: Ice floats. If it did not, the oceans would freeze from the bottom up and earth would now be covered with solid ice. This property in turn is traceable to the unique properties of the hydrogen atom.

The synthesis of carbon--the vital core of all organic molecules--on a significant scale involves what scientists view as an astonishing coincidence in the ratio of the strong force to electromagnetism. This ratio makes it possible for carbon-12 to reach an excited state of exactly 7.65 MeV at the temperature typical of the centre of stars, which creates a resonance involving helium-4, beryllium-8, and carbon-12--allowing the necessary binding to take place during a tiny window of opportunity 10-17 seconds long

There are even more of these physical constants, what scientist are calling the fine-tuning of the universe, the following are excerpts from The Hidden Face of God: How Science Reveals the Ultimate Truth by physicist Gerald Schroeder:

According to growing numbers of scientists, the laws and constants of nature are so "finely-tuned," and so many "coincidences" have occurred to allow for the possibility of life, the universe must have come into existence through intentional planning and intelligence.

In a BBC science documentary, "The Anthropic Principle," some of the greatest scientific minds of our day describe the recent findings which compel this conclusion.Dr. Dennis Scania, the distinguished head of Cambridge University Observatories: If you change a little bit the laws of nature, or you change a little bit the constants of nature -- like the charge on the electron -- then the way the universe develops is so changed, it is very likely that intelligent life would not have been able to develop.

When Sir Fred Hoyle was researching how carbon came to be, in the "blast-furnaces" of the stars, his calculations indicated that it is very difficult to explain how the stars generated the necessary quantity of carbon upon which life on earth depends. Hoyle found that there were numerous "fortunate" one-time occurrences which seemed to indicate that purposeful "adjustments" had been made in the laws of physics and chemistry in order to produce the necessary carbon.Hoyle sums up his findings as follows: A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintendent has monkeyed with the physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. I do not believe that any physicist who examined the evidence could fail to draw the inference that the laws of nuclear physics have been deliberately designed with regard to the consequences they produce within stars. Adds Dr. David D. Deutch: If anyone claims not to be surprised by the special features that the universe has, he is hiding his head in the sand. These special features ARE surprising and unlikely.

Universal Acceptance Of Fine Tuning Besides the BBC video, the scientific establishment's most prestigious journals, and its most famous physicists and cosmologists, have all gone on record as recognizing the objective truth of the fine-tuning. The August '97 issue of "Science" (the most prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journal in the United States) featured an article entitled "Science and God: A Warming Trend?" Here is an excerpt: The fact that the universe exhibits many features that foster organic life -- such as precisely those physical constants that result in planets and long-lived stars -- also has led some scientists to speculate that some divine influence may be present.

In his best-selling book, "A Brief History of Time", Stephen Hawking (perhaps the world's most famous cosmologist) refers to the phenomenon as "remarkable." "The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers (i.e. the constants of physics) seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life". "For example," Hawking writes, "if the electric charge of the electron had been only slightly different, stars would have been unable to burn hydrogen and helium, or else they would not have exploded. It seems clear that there are relatively few ranges of values for the numbers (for the constants) that would allow for development of any form of intelligent life. Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty."

Hawking then goes on to say that he can appreciate taking this as possible evidence of "a divine purpose in Creation and the choice of the laws of science (by God)" (ibid. p. 125).

Dr. Gerald Schroeder, author of "Genesis and the Big Bang" and "The Science of Life" was formerly with the M.I.T. physics department. He adds the following examples:

1) Professor Steven Weinberg, a Nobel laureate in high energy physics (a field of science that deals with the very early universe), writing in the journal "Scientific American", reflects on how surprising it is that the laws of nature and the initial conditions of the universe should allow for the existence of beings who could observe it. Life as we know it would be impossible if any one of several physical quantities had slightly different values.

Although Weinberg is a self-described agnostic, he cannot but be astounded by the extent of the fine-tuning. He goes on to describe how a beryllium isotope having the minuscule half life of 0.0000000000000001 seconds must find and absorb a helium nucleus in that split of time before decaying. This occurs only because of a totally unexpected, exquisitely precise, energy match between the two nuclei. If this did not occur there would be none of the heavier elements. No carbon, no nitrogen, no life. Our universe would be composed of hydrogen and helium. But this is not the end of Professor Weinberg's wonder at our well-tuned universe. He continues: One constant does seem to require an incredible fine-tuning -- The existence of life of any kind seems to require a cancellation between different contributions to the vacuum energy, accurate to about 120 decimal places.

This means that if the energies of the Big Bang were, in arbitrary units, not: 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000,

but instead:

100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000001,

there would be no life of any sort in the entire universe because as Weinberg states: the universe either would go through a complete cycle of expansion and contraction before life could arise, or would expand so rapidly that no galaxies or stars could form.

2) Michael Turner, the widely quoted astrophysicist at the University of Chicago and Fermilab, describes the fine-tuning of the universe with a simile:The precision is as if one could throw a dart across the entire universe and hit a bulls eye one millimeter in diameter on the other side.

3) Roger Penrose, the Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, discovers that the likelihood of the universe having usable energy (low entropy) at the creation is even more astounding,namely, an accuracy of one part out of ten to the power of ten to the power of 123. This is an extraordinary figure. One could not possibly even write the number down in full, in our ordinary denary (power of ten) notation: it would be one followed by ten to the power of 123 successive zeros! (That is a million billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion zeros.)

Penrose continues, Even if we were to write a zero on each separate proton and on each separate neutron in the entire universe -- and we could throw in all the other particles as well for good measure -- we should fall far short of writing down the figure needed. The precision needed to set the universe on its course is to be in no way inferior to all that extraordinary precision that we have already become accustomed to in the superb dynamical equations (Newton's, Maxwell's, Einstein's) which govern the behavior of things from moment to moment.

Cosmologists debate whether the space-time continuum is finite or infinite, bounded or unbounded. In all scenarios, the fine-tuning remains the same.It is appropriate to complete this section on "fine tuning" with the eloquent words of Professor John Wheeler:To my mind, there must be at the bottom of it all, not an utterly simple equation, but an utterly simple IDEA. And to me that idea, when we finally discover it, will be so compelling, and so inevitable, so beautiful, we will all say to each other, "How could it have ever been otherwise?"

We can then add to the above observations by the brightest physicists and cosmologists of our day, who many are agnostic or even atheist and it seems these scientists, even biased against a belief in God, when presented the evidence, unlike their brethren in the life sciences, allow and even exclaim in surprise that it appears someone created this universe.

And now the uniqueness of our earth and the environment on the earth adds to this precise tuning of the overall cosmos. We know that planets that can sustain life must exist around suns much like our sun, for reasons of the life expectancy and radiant output of those suns must exist in a small set in comparison to the rest of the stars in our galaxy. It is also now known that our solar system in order to sustain life must be within a narrow band that circles the galactic center. If in too close to that center radiation and effects of gravity from other stars will not allow stable planetary orbits for the long stretches of time for the preparation of a life sustaining planet.

A life sustaining planet must have considerable surface water; the planet must be in a narrowly defined band around its sun to ensure most of that water stays in a liquid phase. That planet needs to have a very large moon (The earth has the largest moon in comparison to its own size of all the planets in the solar system) in order to produce tidal effects on the oceans that they may not become stagnant. Water must expand when it freezes, one of the few substances that have this property. Water also has many other properties that are unique and go to sustaining life.

A life sustaining planet must have an oxygen atmosphere where the oxygen stays within a narrow range, to high and any fire started will not be put out, too low and life cannot be sustained. The rest of the atmosphere must contain an inert gas as far as oxygen breathing life is concerned. These are just some of the unique conditions that must exist for life to be sustained on a planet. One more mention of the moon. The size and orbit of the moon allowed for humanity to experience total eclipses of the sun, without those phenomena modern science would have had a very tough row to hoe.

I will continue in Part II with the spiritual problems presented by evolution, but it was all intended to come about in the last centuries of our history, for this lie will be exposed and ultimately defeated, in fact it is an assignment given to all mankind to accomplish this task as it is the portal to true worship of God, and a necessary ingredient for the maturing of a human spirit, for as we reject the lie, we receive in ourselves a greater relationship with the spirit of truth, who is the Holy Spirit Himself.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Daniel's Statue Part II

We last left our statue at the destruction of the chest of silver representing the ancient kingdom of Media-Persia). Since I wrote that paper I was watching the movie Charlie Wilson’s War, which depicted the involvement of an American congressman, and ultimately other members of congress to supply weapons to the Mujahedeen to bring down Soviet Helicopters, and destroy Soviet armor. Without knowing some of the details that were revealed in that movie I mentioned that the current great nations of this and the last century by their actions setup for themselves the next level or cycle of divine judgment, our actions come back upon us in unforeseen ways.

The movie has a scene whereby the Maryland congressman Doc Long, who is the Chairman of the United States House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, which controls the funds the Afghanistan fighters need, this congressman is taken to Afghanistan by Charlie Wilson and he is moved by the suffering of the people from Soviet gunships and mines disguised as toys and candy (many little children with missing limbs). He relates to the oppressed people there and while giving a speech mentions that his son was wounded while fighting the communists in Vietnam who were supplied by the Russians.

You can see in the movie the seeds of what the Soviets planted in their joyous opposition to America in Vietnam, now come to fruition with Americans returning the favor. And at the same time you can see the seeds America is then planting in Afghanistan which will eventually sprout and mature and be harvested on Sept 11, 2001. Amazing! While Congressman Doc Long is speaking the people are shouting Allah Akbar, the same cry the 911 Hijackers shouted as they flew the planes into the World Trade Center towers.

And now this Doc Long is the one with the authority to release the funds that bought the weapons that defeated the Russians in Afghanistan. He is actually the only man in the American political system that could pull this trigger. An astounding fulfillment of the law of harvest that God uses to bring judgment, and more particularly in our case it has been an ongoing force in the depiction of the stone cut out of the mountain without hands that we know was released prophetically, yet its physical working is the accumulated and multiplied mistreatment of mankind to one another, metaphorically displayed by the construct of this statue representing the governments of man.

It is remarkable that the greatest cruelty of man to one another is unleashed and multiplied by governments of man, thinking that if we create something so much larger than ourselves that then gives us permission to divest ourselves of morality on an individual level. This is why utopians are the most deadly and dangerous of all human beings. They will not channel their compassion or morality on an individual level, one upon one. To them they must have a vehicle, the State, that will amplify their goodness (they assume they are good) and enforce it upon others in mass. They are unwilling to receive an individual personal morality which only comes by suffering into their own hearts from God, an act that takes a purposeful humility, but they must impose a morality upon others writ large using the projection screen of the State, as if largeness, loudness, and force will finally convince them that they are truly good, truly compassionate. As if outward grandiose displays confirm they are the possessors of an inwardly worked and Godly righteousness.

This is the reverse of morality and the dead end of self-righteousness, the final result of man rejecting an absolute morality from God. History makes it apparent this is a monumental failure, an ever growing and deadly lie, now culminating in divine judgment upon this idol and construct of man. God’s hatred is certainly against this abomination; the violence of the destruction of this statue is inexorable and will not be delayed.

God will lay low Presidents and Kings and put his vessels, no matter how lowly, into positions of authority to see this purpose accomplished. There must be a Holy indignation and weariness with this vast cruelty over the ages. This destruction of human beings by these invented, yet strangely alive beasts of the governance of man. What tortures have they invented? What oppression and slavery have they sponsored? What madness revealed by the depredations upon human beings by mad Emperors and Czars, by Satanically ambitious men and woman driven to rule over others, the inventions of instruments of torture to terrorize the multitudes, the enslavement of others to increase wealth and luxury for the few, what a miserable history we have with only a glimpse of light here and there through the ages.

The first Gulf War began with Air Assaults on January 17th, 1991. On the same day King Olav V of Norway died. King Olav V was the oldest reigning Monarch in the earth. Certainly his death was a signal that now was the time for the head of gold to be crushed, as the head of gold represents our oldest kingdom in Daniel’s statue.

The ground invasion begins on Feb 23, 1991 and ends on Feb 27, 1991. Bush I announces on Feb 27 that the cease fire will begin Feb 28, 1991. Iraq has accepted all U.N. Resolutions. The ground war lasted 5 days. This war sets many records, certainly one of the fastest wars. It also has the approval of every nation on earth except Jordan and Yemen. In a sense practically all the nations in the earth are in agreement with this attack on Saddam’s Iraq, the head of gold, ancient Babylon in our vision.

Now here is where it gets interesting in that Bush I, listens to his advisors and stops short of invading Baghdad and deposing Saddam Hussein. This was done under the excuse that the U.N. mandate did not give permission to depose Saddam, however this is nonsense, we had already invaded Iraq and destroyed their military power, Saddam was the central cause of all this trouble, we did not complete the mission because of Political Correctness, as many, and most importantly, Colin Powel, was worried about world opinion because of the total destruction of Iraqi troops along what was being called the highway of death from Kuwait to Baghdad.

This refusal to conquer Iraq and depose Saddam created terrible problems for Arabs in the south of Iraq, and the Kurds in the north of Iraq, who had believed, and had been told, that America was committed and we had even encouraged them to rebel against Saddam, which they did. But when America stopped and withdrew, instead these people were slaughtered by the thousands. Saddam even drained the swamps in the south (one of the great ecological disasters in history, and where was the worldwide protests?) to persecute the marsh Arabs. One British reporter recounts how Saddam had the people from one Arab village rounded up and laid down on the road and they asphalted over those people while they were still alive.

He also gassed the Kurds in the north and filled his prisons and filled mass graves with political opponents, or anyone that resisted his rule. This is the time of rape rooms, of the children of his opponents tortured and imprisoned (Our marines freed some of these children in the second Gulf War) this can be laid at the feet of Bush I. Damn Kings and Presidents when they obey man, and political correctness instead of God. No wonder that Bush I went from an unheard of 95% approval rating to being defeated by an unknown governor from Arkansas just one year later.

I will recount a few stories of this time for all those that protest that we should not have gone into Iraq in 2003. Saddam had a room created which had a multitude of pipes running in all directions across the top of the room. A naked prisoner who had incurred the wrath of this maniac would be put into this room and in a random manner sulfuric acid would drip from pinholes in these pipes. The unfortunate victim would never know where the next drip was coming from or when. So huddled in this corner or that the poor individual would be tortured for days, when he finally fell asleep in exhaustion, here would come another drip of acid to awaken him in screaming agony.

Saddam’s two sons delighted in feeding those that displeased them feet first into industrial shredders; they liked to put them in feet first as they enjoyed the screaming until the shredder reached vital organs. Saddam’s two sons would also randomly pick up women from the streets of Baghdad and rape whoever they willed; many were killed after these two monsters were finished. One of the ways Saddam used to destroy his enemies is to take any who had a young daughter and have his goons rape the little girl to death right in front of the parents, before he killed the parents. This is darkness nearly incomprehensible to the Western mind. Yet the spoiled children of a materialist West cared nothing for these atrocities, but were enraged by what amounted to three months of fraternity level hazing, except in a few cases, of prisoners taken in battle and incarcerated in Abu Gharib prison by some out of control and unattended American military prison guards of low intelligence and lower morals. And unlike anything in the Islamic world, once the abuse was discovered, America prosecuted and jailed these miscreants.

According to the French academic Dominique ReyniƩ, between January 3 and April 12, 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the Iraq war. This is amazing that a world that cared nothing for a suffering Iraq for decades is now organized and outraged that America and a few allies are going to war to depose one of the most brutal and murderous tyrants of human history. It is evidence that there must be an organizing principle at work here beyond human intelligence, something that is so violently opposed to this course of events that a breathtaking hypocrisy by humanity is hardly noticed.

And later we find the documents in Iraq that the three nations with the most vociferous opposition from their political leaders against this invasion were all enriching themselves via the Oil for Food U.N. orchestrated scam with Saddam Hussein; that being Russia’s Putin, France’s Chirac, and Germany’s Schroeder. What a monumental disgrace, this was the largest financial scam in human history, aided and abetted by Kojo Annan, the son of the General Secretary of the U.N. Kofi Annan.

Papers such as the New York Times that ran over 37 above the fold stories on page one about Abu Gharib could hardly be bothered about that scandal other than to minimize the actors and the nations that were involved. They were too busy being the choral conductor for what later became Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS). It goes almost beyond belief that the political Left was at this time praising the sophistication of Europe, and the European tradition of appeasement of dictators, while castigating Bush as an unintelligent cowboy.

From these above actions we can see that a great deception is upon mankind and a real fear is shown by the spiritual powers that have ruled the earth. They do not want this completion, the final crushing of the head of Gold of Daniel’s statue. Already one American President’s legacy was destroyed on this rock, and America was led by a venal narcissist for eight years, a scriptural judgment for a nation as the Bible says God places “capricious children” in authority over disobedient nations. You cannot sum up the character of Bill Clinton better. Even if the Left thinks his Presidency was an unprecedented time for America, in God’s view it was part of a judgment. And it is a historical fact that the groundwork for 911 was laid during the Clinton years of treating terrorism as if it is a domestic crime, something to be pursued in the courts.

And it is not a coincidence that another Biblical principle comes into focus with the election of George W. Bush in 2000 in that God brings back the son to finish what was originally commanded to be done by the father. Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying George Bush the father heard from God like prophets of old, yet he had a commissioning to end the rule of Saddam Hussein and complete the cycle of the crushing of the Head of Gold. Any sane human being with the power to end such a terrible tyranny as that of Saddam Hussein and then seemingly by divine fiat given the circumstances, the excuse, and the backing of almost the entire world to then not act upon this is a man unwilling to listen to God in his conscious, or so afraid of public opinion he is rendered impotent and ultimately disobedient to divine influence.

But the purpose of God is not thwarted, not ever in all of history, it can be delayed by the disobedience of man, but God will simply up the anti. So all the circumstances were aligned to bring down Saddam Hussein in 1991, and if George Bush I had done what was divinely commanded the recent history of America would have been different. Instead America is put to sleep for a while. Enjoying the “peace dividend,” and unprecedented prosperity, all is well, can’t be better. Except for the lack of morality of our President and the phony dot com economy which begins to collapse during the last years of the Clinton Presidency, all seems well.

Yet we can now look back and see America is being set up for a fall. We do nothing about our dependence on foreign oil (Read Islamic or Russian controlled oil). We ignore the threat of growing world wide Islamic Jihad, heck that is Israel’s problem. We interfere via Bill Clinton in the election process in Israel to secure a government there that is more willing to negotiate away land for peace, and win back for ourselves a most bitter election in 2000, one that sows the seeds of political hatred that is still in the process of maturing for harvest.

Then comes 911, another window opens for America to execute divine judgment, and Bush II goes through that window, but awkwardly, without the overabundance of favorable circumstances that were presented to his father, that time is past, this will now be a hard task to accomplish, not that Bush II or the military planners thought so at the time. And I think Bush II sowed the seeds of some of the resistance to himself in that he did not emphasize the moral imperative to depose Saddam, instead he and his handlers went the cynical route of appealing to American’s self interest and emphasizing the belief of finding Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Bush would have been better served to emphasize the brutal tyranny of Saddam over his people as the primary reason to depose Saddam. Instead it was all a bet on finding WMD in Iraq. If the moral reasons were emphasized, first it is something that I believe God would honor, as that is what is in God’s heart, to deliver the oppressed, unless I have misread the Bible. Secondly there was an abundance of witnesses and evidence of Saddam’s brutality that could have been paraded to the world and media that would have put them on the defensive, in that how do you argue to NOT free people from torture and oppression? Thirdly, if you do not find WMD, it is not as important, because you did not emphasize this as the primary reason for deposing Saddam.

It is my belief that even if WMD were found, Bush would have still been hated, this is not a hatred based on reason, but upon spiritual deception orchestrated by the spiritual powers (fallen angels) that want to continue to rule humanity.

The invasion of Iraq starts on March 20 2003 and American troops are in Baghdad on May 1, 2003. This invasion phase took 43 days, an amazing coincidence, as the entire Gulf War in 1991 took just 43 days. It is a set piece to remind those that are inquiring that the original purpose of God was for this war to take 43 days. But after the invasion the real suffering and work begins, now it will not be an easy task and this war will extend for years not days.

Thousands of Americans will lose their lives and many thousands will be maimed and wounded, not to mention the tens of thousands of Iraqis that will lose their lives in bombings and mayhem, Moslems, killing Moslems. For it was during the 12 years and 20 days between the end of the first Gulf war and the beginning of the second Gulf or Iraq war that Saddam’s plans for invasion were laid. The training for resistance, the stockpiling of huge supplies of explosives and guns, all coming back to haunt the invading army that would have not suffered even a fraction of this mayhem if Saddam had been taken down when God had commanded this to be done.

If there is any doubt that this was the purpose we can look at the numbers involved. The number 43 is prominent in both wars. 43 days for the totality of the first Iraq war. 43 days for the invasion of Iraq in the second Iraq war. We can see that the time from the end of the first Iraq war to the beginning of the second Iraq war is 12 years and 20 days. These are all significant Biblical numbers according to E.F. Bullinger’s Number in Scripture

The number 12 in scripture concerns governmental perfection. The number 20 relates to expectancy, or a period of waiting. So the 12 years and twenty days between these two wars is concerned with the perfection of divine government, yet there is delay, there is some expectant waiting. This directly relates to the stone cut out of the mountain without hands (which represents the Government or “Kingdom” of God on this earth).

We can see that finally crushing the head of gold is finishing “mystically,” the reign of the government(s) of man and that the governance is switching at that time to God, or I think what might be more exact, that the influence upon the affairs and governance of man will be from a prophetic level. For a while the image of that statue might remain in the consciousness of humanity, but its power is broken, man will be ruled by the prophetic word in the mouths of those given to God; those that have been tried in the fire of God, those that have been humbled by suffering.
The number 43 is the combination of 40 which represents a period of probation, trial, and chastisement—(not judgment, like the number 9, which stands in connection with the punishment of enemies, but the chastisement of sons, and of a covenant people).

This is fascinating because only two nations on the earth are covenant nations, Israel and America. And even more specifically within these two nations are people that have real walks with God and are being chastised as sons.

The number 3 in Bullinger’s words: Three, therefore, stands for that which is solid, real, substantial, complete, and entire. All things that are especially complete are stamped with this number three. God's attributes are three: omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence. There are three great divisions completing time--past, present, and future. Three persons, in grammar, express and include all the relationships of mankind. Thought, word, and deed, complete the sum of human capability. Three degrees of comparison complete our knowledge of qualities. The simplest proposition requires three things to complete it; viz., the subject, the predicate, and the copula. Three propositions are necessary to complete the simplest form of argument--the major premise, the minor, and the conclusion.

It would seem this number 43 given such significance in the last act of the crushing of Daniel’s image in the combined meaning of 40 and 3 is the completion of the chastisement and preparation of the sons of God to rule on this earth, not just ideologically or mystically, but in a way that will have a full physical impact upon this earth.

No wonder the forces of Satan have raged at the completion of the destruction of the head of Gold in Daniel’s statue. No wonder the blind and nearly universal deception on the earth and the hatred toward one man (George W. Bush) who was simply an imperfect instrument in accomplishing this task. And coupled with that hatred of the man, the hatred of the principle country that was used to accomplish this task, even by those that have lived in this country and been blessed exceedingly. Can anyone point to any of these people who protest so much whose personal lives have been touched even one iota by the policies of Bush or this nation in pursuing this goal?

Hollywood puts out movie after move depicting anything related to the war on terror or the war in Iraq as either crazed troops or depraved intelligence operatives from America torturing and oppressing wonderful Muslim people, when the truth is that 25 million oppressed people were given the opportunity via American blood and treasure to enjoy the vote even at the risk of their lives, something taken as a given in America, and thought by many on the Left as too onerous a task, unless you can register without ID, or at the DMV, or if you could just simply hit a button on your remote to vote for the next entitlement.

All the actors and directors and producers go from rich to richer, yet they howl as if they are being oppressed by Jack-booted thugs, although they have not lost one personal freedom, nor have they again been attacked by Islamic thugs. Yet the greatest attack on American soil has not produced one positive major American movie depicting the bravery and sacrifice of our troops, or any realistic treatment of Islamic fundamentalism.

Indeed they have taken books that depicted Islamic terrorism, and made movies where the villains become neo-Nazis, or albinos. Hollywood and our own media have given us one of the greatest displays of cowardice in human history. Charles Martel must be turning over in his grave.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Daniel's Statue Part I

2,500 years ago Daniel penned the following interpretation of a vision given to Nebuchadnezzar King of Babylon concerning the great gentile Empires of man. Daniel received the vision separately from God, as Nebuchadnezzar demanded that would be the requirement so that he could trust the interpretation. The vision and interpretation was given to Daniel after fasting and prayer by himself and three other captive Israelites of Noble lineage. If he had not received the vision he would have been killed along with all the mystics and wise men of Babylon.

Daniel 2: 31-45

"My king, as you were watching, a colossal statue appeared. That statue, tall and dazzling, was standing in front of you, and its appearance was terrifying. The head of the statue was pure gold, its chest and arms were silver, its stomach and thighs were bronze, its legs were iron, and its feet were partly iron and partly fired clay. As you were watching, a stone broke off without a hand touching it, struck the statue on its feet of iron and fired clay, and crushed them. Then the iron, the fired clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were shattered and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors. The wind carried them away, and not a trace of them could be found. But the stone that struck the statue became a great mountain and filled the whole earth.

This was the dream; now we will tell the king its interpretation. Your Majesty, you are king of kings. The God of heaven has given you sovereignty, power, strength, and glory. Wherever people live—or wild animals, or birds of the air—He has handed them over to you and made you ruler over them all. You are the head of gold.

"After you, there will arise another kingdom, inferior to yours, and then another, a third kingdom, of bronze, which will rule the whole earth. A fourth kingdom will be as strong as iron; for iron crushes and shatters everything, and like iron that smashes, it will crush and smash all the others. You saw the feet and toes, partly of a potter's fired clay and partly of iron—it will be a divided kingdom, though some of the strength of iron will be in it. You saw the iron mixed with clay, and that the toes of the feet were part iron and part fired clay—part of the kingdom will be strong, and part will be brittle. You saw the iron mixed with clay—the peoples will mix with one another but will not hold together, just as iron does not mix with fired clay.

In the days of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, and this kingdom will not be left to another people. It will crush all these kingdoms and bring them to an end, but will itself endure forever. You saw a stone break off from the mountain without a hand touching it, and it crushed the iron, bronze, fired clay, silver, and gold. The great God has told the king what will happen in the future. The dream is true, and its interpretation certain."

Daniel shows us that the head of the statue represents the past; the kingdom of Babylon that existed from 604 BC to 538 BC (Present day Iraq) The Persian Kingdom is actually a dual kingdom of Persia (Iran) and Media (Northeast Iran) which lasts from 538 BC to 323 BC. The Greek empire lasts from 323 BC to about 102 BC. Rome comes to power in 102 BC and according to Daniel’s interpretation; the Roman Empire exists in a divided and weakened form down to our day.

A stone is then cut out of a mountain without hands, signifying this is not a human initiated action, but divinely initiated. And what is a divine occurrence in human events is always a prophetic or spiritual event. It does not mean it is not observed in history, but unlike the empires of Daniel’s vision it is not men with ambition and ego conquering and building kingdoms and empires, it is about God destroying all the cultures and governments of man in preparation for His Kingdom, His government.

Can we see this event taking place in history? The stone striking the feet of the image and crushing them, then the stone growing until it smashes the whole of the statue and replaces the governments of man which are always represented by metals or beasts in the Bible? An apt representation for governments which are something smelted, constructed, and worked into an image by mankind. Also governments, all governments, become rapacious beasts devouring the humanity they always proclaim to liberate or protect.

Note the American government was not a celebration of the governance of man, but was designed by founders far wiser than our leaders today in that they knew government would grow to be a beast, better to divide government into competing and jealous parts to frustrate its ability to take over all aspects of human life. Our last election is to our shame as Americans, because we have lost the knowledge of our founders that government is not our friend, instead over half of Americans now look to human government as a savior, at the very time God is destroying the ability for human government to function, let alone to act as a savior.

An event as prophesied by Daniel must be a major worldwide event, so we look to something that came against the remnants of the Roman Empire far into the days after it became a divided Empire and the feet rest upon the cities of Rome and Constantinople (Present day Istanbul). That event was WWI, which started on June 28, 1914 with the assassination of the Archduke of Austria, Franz Ferdinand, in Sarajevo (Bosnia-Herzegovina). This initiated the destruction of the world order of Europe. It ended the 437 year rule of most of Europe by the Hapsburg dynasty. It ended the 462 year rule of the Moslem Ottoman Empire of the Turks, and immediately following WWI the Russian Czarist system founded by Ivan the Terrible in 1552 was sent crashing down by the communist revolution.

WWI reverberates through all of the 20th and now into the 21st century, like the aftershocks of a great earthquake. All the maps of Europe and the Middle East are redrawn; the conditions for more war are created by the Allies stupid and cruel treatment of Germany following the armistice. The stone has struck, now it just has to grow in size and grind all representation of Daniel’s image to dust.

As we progress up the legs we come to the abdomen of bronze, signifying the philosophies and culture of Greece are next to suffer the destruction from this growing stone cut out of a mountain. WWII begins; it is America that is the premier player in this war, America that prides itself on democracy, that governmental invention of the Greeks. America is a mix of Roman and Greek values, Roman law, Greek culture. The stone keeps grinding, although America seems to emerge from WWII stronger than ever our preeminence is immediately contested by Russian and Chinese communism, and a weakness to confront these threats within by our own government See the story of Algier Hiss The cold war begins, eventually America is weakened culturally, morally, and financially by the demands of the cold war, yet at the same time we take down the Russians and seemingly subdue the aspirations and naked communism of the Chinese by seducing them with a huge market for their goods.

America represents the abdomen of bronze the holder of the Greek culture, the stone now grows until it reaches to the breast of silver. Russia and China enjoyed our distress in Korea and Vietnam, bleeding us by supplying our enemies with weapons and training. Now it is time for us to return the favor, bleeding Russia to the point of collapse by supplying their enemies with weapons and training to thwart their adventure in Afghanistan (along with Iran the greater part of the Persian empire at it’s greatest extent).

In fact the ancient Persian Empire had boundaries that included Libya on the west to all of Afghanistan and Pakistan on the east. It extended down the east coast of Africa to present day Ethiopia, and northwards to encompass all of Turkey and most of Greece.

The Russians invaded Afghanistan in December 25th 1979, and less than a year later Iraq under Saddam Hussein invaded Iran on September 22, 1980, the stone is crushing the chest of silver as the center of the ancient Persian Empire is present day Iran and Afghanistan

Russian forces withdrew from Afghanistan on February 15, 1989. The Russians lost about 15,000 troops in this conflict, but more importantly it bled them of money, respect, and resources at a time when President Reagan was building up the American Military. The Afghanistan conflict contributed in no small way to the final breakup of the Soviet Union, a process that was completed on December 8, 1991

The Iran/Iraq war ended on August 20th 1988, with the loss of over one million Iranian lives and the loss of between two hundred fifty thousand to five hundred thousand Iraqi lives. This was no small conflict, the largest since WWII, and costing billions of dollars. Interesting to note that only Russia and the United States supplied both sides during this war, most other countries supported Iraq exclusively, especially the Arab States, noteworthy is only Israel and North Korea supported Iran exclusively, war makes for strange bedfellows. Henry Kissinger remarked that "it's a pity they [Iran and Iraq] both can't lose."

I will continue in Part II of Daniel’s Statue with the final conflicts of the stone crushing the head of gold. These human conflicts beginning at WWI are all in some way the same war, just various battles. The linkage that produces the next series of battles is amazing as the stupid, greedy and warlike nature of the nations, produces the very conditions that guarantee the next series of battles or wars.

Russia gloats at our bleeding in Vietnam; but soon we will soon gloat at, and cause their bleeding in Afghanistan. Europe gloated at a supine and punished Germany at the end of WWI; but soon the world will pay in blood for crushing their brothers. And does God even now, as He did in ancient times, raise up nations if even for a short time, to punish other nations? Of course, see how communism has been used to help with the destruction of the cultures of man, and apostate Christianity, especially the Eastern orthodox church.

And why are the toes of clay and iron referring to the inability of the peoples to mix? It is speaking of the attempt to combine people in a multi-cultural world, which will ultimately fail. Also a most important result of both WWI and WWII is the creation of the state of Israel, which among other things acts as a prophetic clock setting a time limit to the completion of the destruction of the present order.

Finally, what was the identifiable prophetic event that launched so great a move of history, so complete a destruction of human governance of the preeminence of nations and of all the inheritance of human culture and philosophy? Can we identify this event? Yes, it was the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the great Welsh Revival of 1904, and the Azusa Street outpourings in 1906 in Los Angeles. These outpourings spread throughout the Anglo-speaking world and beyond.

The Pentecostal movement was a result of those outpourings. Now much of that traditional movement has become ossified and nothing of the fire remains in most of the traditional churches of Pentecostal denominations. However many movements, some known, some obscure, resulted from that time of outpouring. This resulted in many millions of people, receiving the Holy Spirit, and the return of the gifts of the spirit, including healings and miracles, but most importantly the gift of Prophecy, the very gift that the Apostle Paul put above all the other gifts.

A fascinating tie to both the worldly manifestation of this destruction by the stone cut out of mountains without hands, and the prophetic source can be seen in the life of Rees Howells the great intercessor from the Welsh Revival. Eventually Rees founded a Bible College that became so noted in the power of prayer that he and his students were given privileged and secret information of British war plans, in order that they might pray for victory during WWII.

What does that mean to our story? Since the beginning of the 20th century men and women have once again been empowered to speak prophetically in the earth. And we should remember that prophecy is not foretelling the future, it is the empowerment of God in us to CREATE the future. God is not a fortune teller, He is the creator, and He endows us with the power to create our own history, to create our own destiny, and ultimately to create the Kingdom of God on this earth, to which his son shall return to rule with us…as he is Lord of Lords, and King of Kings.

For all these decades there has been obscure groups, churches here and there, prophesying the end of man’s kingdoms and the beginning of God’s kingdom. The rule of the earth will not come from parliaments and congresses, or from the stronghold of tyrants, but it will come from the unknown and the humble, from those that groan within themselves for the righteousness of God to fill the earth; with the insurance that unrighteous and selfish prayers or prophecy will not be answered.

Just as Christ came and was born in a barn, a lowly place, unnoticed, until finally when recognized as someone strange and unique and ultimately powerful, the powers that be conspired to kill Him. But it is said that at His second coming He will not be put to death again. A time comes when His prophets will not be put to death, but they shall slay the beast, and that time is upon us now, we are living in the most incredible time in all of human history, the transition from the rule of man to a prophetic rule by his Word. The earth will be ruled by the faithful prayers and prophecy of men and woman that have no personal axe to grind, have no personal fortune to win, and who do not even have a guarantee they will see the completion of that for which they travail, but the spirit within them moves them to proclaim His rule be established. What do you choose? Do you choose the rule of man, the destruction and pollution of the earth, the killing of the animals, the false hopes, the greed, the lies, and the self-seeking? Or do you choose the righteous yet loving rule of the King of Kings?

Saturday, November 8, 2008

The Election of Barney the Purple Dinosaur

I am going to call this the Barney election. 52% of Americans abdicated their responsibility for freedom, both for this land and for the world by electing Barney the Purple Dinosaur. Several years ago I wrote a paper with the observation that the Democratic Party keeps offering candidates that amount to a recapitulation of a human being in a reverse chronological order. Each candidate since Kennedy represents a certain age of a normal human lifespan.

Kennedy represented a young self-centered male, probably in his thirties. Kennedy had some vision for the nation, but I think most was soaring rhetoric that enabled him to get the job in the first place. Kennedy was an unmitigated disaster for this nation, Camelot aside. Kennedy was a moral degenerate along with his entire family from father on down. The Kennedy fortune was won during the prohibition by the actions of his bootlegging, gangster father. A vile and vindictive man that swore he would use his fortune to make one of his sons President, not for love of country, but to spite the political elites of Boston that dared to spurn him.

That Presidency was won by once again a complicit MSM (yes they were utterly biased even then) by hiring hookers to seduce delegates at the Los Angeles convention, and by the dirty Chicago, dead voter political machine (how things stay the same!). Once in office Kennedy ramped up defense spending to pay off political debts, thus alarming the Russians and starting the cold war. When Kennedy ramped up defense spending, particularly the production of ICBMS, the United States already had a ten to one missile superiority over the Russians, so of course they were alarmed. But the worthless and treacherous MSM do not tell you that story. The MSM also glossed over Kennedy’s utter betrayal of brave men in the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Not to mention his stupid weakness displayed to Khrushchev brought the world close to nuclear extinction, we were very, very close. So much for style and a debonair manner, Khrushchev was not impressed by Camelot.

Nor does the MSM tell the story of the Kennedy brothers passing around a dysfunctional and suicidal Marilyn Monroe for their carnal pleasures. These were evil men, no matter what the complicit MSM says about them. The same MSM that watched millions die under Stalin and did not report these things to the world, even though the NYT and their star reporter of the 20’s and 30’s Walter Duranty knew about these atrocities, their sympathy to Russian Communism trumped their duty to report the truth. For this reason I damn before God the NYT, they will answer for this and many other crimes.

So Kennedy is assassinated and Johnson comes on board. Johnson is like an idealistic young girl, foisting the great society upon America, which turned out to be an utter failure and ensured the accelerating destruction of the black families in America. He was also an incompetent boob in the handling of the Vietnam War which seems to have done far more damage to America than all the bombs dropped on the jungles of Vietnam.

We have the interlude of Nixon, a man despised by the Left for his earlier stands against communism and subsequently destroyed for the same things all his Democratic predecessors practiced with a vengeance.

Ford is just an intermission and job security for the one dimensional Chevy Chase.

Then we get Carter, a bumbling and awkward idiot of a man, with no comprehension of just about anything. His miserable handling of Iran gives us an implacable enemy both the U.S. and Israel must deal with at some time or face catastrophic consequences. Carter was perhaps still a twenty something in his actions, but a very stupid twenty something. Carter is someone who I think stopped in his intellectual and emotional growth about his first year in college. His later subsequent sucking up to every tyrant in the earth bespeaks to me of some psychological need, perhaps a Daddy issue or something. He could be a lifetime project for some enterprising Psychologist.

Reagan comes along and we actually have an adult for awhile. I remember how the media painted him as a script reading B movie actor, something between a moron and an idiot. But years later Reagan’s letters are published and what do we find out? Reagan was brilliant, a man of deep thoughts with a breadth of knowledge and an ability to relate to people from all different levels and even ages. Not to mention an economic boom that lasted well past even Bush I, a revitalized military and some restraint (but not much) of government growth. Of course he was universally hated by the infant class of liberals, and despised by the MSM.

We then get Bush 1, another adult, but dull in comparison to Reagan, a man without his own ideas, pretty much a bureaucrat, a technician. He is beat by Clinton the narcissist. Clinton is the full blown teenager, cruising for chicks in the Oval Office (“Better put some ice on that,” he says to Juanita Broderick after raping her and fattening her lip because she was fighting him.”) Not a feminist in sight among the discarded and abused women at Bill’s feet.

We almost get Gore who is a child with a pouty countenance and balled up fists, yelling out how he will “fight for us.” All of these men have one thing in common, it is all about THEM! Kerry is the same, a self-promoting liar; a man that took a video camera with him to war to film himself in heroic poses after battle engagements. (Who the hell plans like that)? A man that marries into money twice, does anyone think there is love between this man and the Ketchup Queen? Was/is there any between Bill and Hillary? These are medieval marriages for convenience and political power only.

We get Bush II, another unimaginative Bush, at least he tries to fight radical Islam a true enemy to all Western Civilization, but the problem is he does not know how to articulate what is a true and deadly danger, I doubt if he really understands it to the spiritual depths of the evil this has been on the earth since Mohammed received his “revelation,” in a fit of demonic possession. Mohammed is a murderer, and pedophile, how the hell can anyone still sane follow the disturbed drivel this man wrote down?

Finally we come to the election of Obama. The Democrats can not give us someone regressed more than Al Gore else he would be a fetus in the womb. Instead the electorate has itself regressed to belief in the message from a Purple Dinosaur. (I love you, you love me, and we are just one big family)…sorry I am back I had to go throw up. Yep liberal schools and pop culture have succeeded in creating a generation, mostly those under 30 who think in bumper sticker slogans, if they think at all, and group-think, multiculturalism instilled from the crib by Sesame Street and Barney the Purple Dinosaur. If you want to be really frightened watch Jay Leno’s man in the street interviews; you will be surprised these people can feed themselves.

Perhaps if things go the way history would dictate (fortunately God is above history and human plans) future historians would write of the 2,000 years of dark ages that befell a technologically advanced civilization all because the leading nation and defender of human freedom began believing in the message of a Purple Dinosaur. Perhaps future archeologists would scour the earth looking for Purple Dinosaur bones.

Friday, October 31, 2008

How to Stop Plagues and Disasters

Following is a list of natural disasters that have taken place on American soil since George H. Bush initiated the “Land for Peace,” conference in Madrid, Spain on October 30, 1991, the list was compiled by the authors John McTernan (a retired federal agent in the treasury department), and Bill Koenig (a White House correspondent). From the book Israel: Blessing or the Curse.

On October 31, 1991 one of the greatest storms of the century came ashore in New England. George Bush’s house in Kennebunkport Maine suffered extensive damage, and the Bush family lost many irreplacable heirlooms. The storm then tracked down the east coast, the opposite direction of hurricanes. A movie starring Mark Walburg called "The Perfect Storm," was made about this event.

On August 23, 1992 “Land for Peace" talks took place in Washington D.C. On the very same day hurricane Andrew devastated Florida with 30 billion in loses, making it up to that time the costliest natural disaster in American History.

Additionally George H. Bush went from a 92% (unheard of) approval rating in February 1991, to be defeated by the narcissist Bill Clinton, an almost total unknown in the democratic primary of 6 other contenders. (Remember the 7 dwarfs?).

On January 16, 1994: Bill Clinton meets with Syrian President Hafez Assad in Geneva to discuss more “Land for Peace,” arrangements. Less than a day later a 6.8 earthquake struck Northridge, CA, just north of Los Angeles, CA, total cost is estimated at about 30 billion, along with 57 deaths.

The following is a list of natural or man made disasters that happened as the result of meetings between Yasser Arafat and Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

Sept 1, 1993: President Bill Clinton announces he will meet with Arafat and Rabin in Washington D.C. on Sept 13th. Hurricane Emily hits North Carolina a glancing blow, only causing 50 million in damage and 3 deaths.

March 2, 1997: Arafat meets with President Bill Clinton in Washington D.C. on that day Arkansas is hit by as many as 20 tornados, killing 25 people with flooding in Kentucky and Ohio

January 21, 1998: Bill Clinton is waiting to meet with Arafat at the White House. This is the same day the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal comes to light.

September 27, 1998: Bill Clinton meets with Arafat in Washington D.C., Hurricane George hits Alabama and stalls until Arafat leaves.

October 17, 1998: Arafat meets with Bill Clinton at the Wye Plantation in Maryland. Texas experiences disastrous rains and flooding.

November 23, 1998: Arafat meets with Bill Clinton, the stock market falls 216 points (that was a huge fall then)

December 12, 1998: Bill Clinton is meeting with Arafat in Gaza, the House of Representatives votes for the President's impeachment..

March 23, 1999: Arafat meets with Clinton in Washington D.C. the stock market falls 219 points.

September 3, 1999: Secretary of State Albright meets with Arafat in Israel, Hurricane Dennis comes ashore on this same day.

September 22, 1999: Clinton and Arafat meet in Washington D.C. The day before and the day after this meeting the stock market fell more than 200 points each day. This was the first time in history the market lost more than 200 points on two days in the week.

June 16, 2000: Arafat and Clinton meet, the market falls 265 points.

June 12-16, 2000: Arafat at the Camp David meetings. Terrible forest fires ravage the western United States, Yellowstone is devastated. Over 7 million acres burn during these fires.

November 9, 2000: Arafat meets with Clinton, the nation enters an election crisis which takes weeks to resolve, and permanently poisons the American political atmosphere.

June 6, 2001: Bush sends CIA director George Tenet to Israel to broker a deal to stop construction in disputed settlement areas. Hurricane Allison comes ashore in Texas and finally cuts a swath up into Pennsylvania with 4 billion in damage and 50 lives lost. (Just like his father before him, Bush Jr has a storm that aims directly at his home state when he continues the same diplomatic insanity of pressuring Israel to give up “Land for Peace.”

On October 2, 2001: President Bush issues his first statement in favor of a Palestinian State. On that same day the Anthrax terrorist attacks begin in Florida.

In the opinion of the authors of the book Israel: Blessing or the Curse? America is now experiencing the same sort of low level terrorist war that we have helped induce in Israel. I tend to agree with that theory. Even a skeptical reading of these events should make any leader in America take pause, but who listens; who thinks God is actually doing any of these things? I think we have leaders like Egypt had in the days of Moses, until finally the advisers to Pharaoh came to him after most of the plagues and they told him, “Let these people go, do you not realize Egypt is destroyed?”

I shudder to think what Obama will do, if he wins, as it looks like he will be the least sympathetic to Israel of all our past Presidents since Truman. Get ready America.

I have more of these “coincidences,” that I have found that link natural disasters in America to our dealings with Israel. Here is just one and it is about Hurricane Katrina which hit New Orleans on the morning of August 29, 2005 with estimated financial costs of $86 billion (Some say as much as $200 billion) This is the most costly natural disaster in U.S. history. At least 1,800 people lost their lives, making it the 5th deadliest hurricane in American History. Now Israel began forced disengagement of Israeli citizens from settlements in Gaza (that Israel had in previous years encouraged) on August 15th 2005 and completed this process with some settlers being violently removed by Israeli security forces, then their houses bulldozed and all Israelis’ and Israeli forces had withdrawn by September 12th 2005. So Hurricane Katrina comes ashore and bulldozes thousand of American Homes, killing nearly two thousand in the middle of this process.

This forced process had come about by all the years of meddling by United States policy towards Israel; Part of the “Land for Peace,” mentality. I think the linkage is beyond obvious. I have not gone into any of the morality by any side with these observations. I am just showing the connections. To me it looks like we are messing with something that is bringing great destruction upon us as a nation. Presidents are ruined against these rocks, and apparently nations can be ruined also.

Friday, October 24, 2008

A Nation of Judases

In Jesus Christ Superstar, the best vocalist, and best songs were by Judas. There is some confusion about Judas, why does he have the greatest place of dishonor in the Bible? Christ said of him it would have been better if he had never been born. I mean all he was trying to do was to force Jesus to be more himself, to stop doing these lame miracles for whores, tax-collectors, lepers and all the various losers coming to him for deliverance.

Come on Jesus, get with it, kill these Romans who oppress us and setup your long prophesied kingdom and “psssstt,” since I was the only one of the disciples to clearly discern your REAL intent and I forced events, by betraying you, I think I could at least be the number 2 man in that Kingdom. And you know, wink, wink that kiss thing was to show you it is all understood, you do understand right?

But we saw earlier Judas’s real motive and spirit. When Mary, (Either Magdalene, or the sister of Lazarus) came to him a few days before the crucifixion, somehow knowing by revelation that the crucifixion was coming, she knelt at his feet and broke an alabaster vessel filled with a very expensive perfumed ointment, and put it on his feet and wiped his feet with her hair, crying all the while. When Judas saw this he was filled with rage and rebuked the Lord and the woman for this terrible waste as the price of that ointment was about a years wages in those days, so for an American that would be about $40,000.00 dollars.

And Judas, trying to cover what he was really all about (an ambitious and political thief) said, why was this not sold and the money given to the poor? And Jesus rebuked Judas and said, “The poor you have with you always, but you do not always have me.” Now when Judas did this it was not a content free harmless little rage. It had all the backing of satanic power, when hit by such a force most of us just melt, and Mary could have felt condemned by the power of this uber-religious rant. And think of this; Christ in all his agony upon the cross, alone, abandoned even by God the father, could still smell that ointment coming up to him, perhaps the only reminder in the darkest hour on the earth of WHY he was suffering such torment and agony. It was for all the Mary’s then and to come, that would break through in true spiritual revelation and see who He was and would worship with the abandon and love that only the truly redeemed can know.

It may be Mary’s act was the only thing that brought him through, when ready to give up and to ask the Father to rescue him, to judge the satanically possessed Pharisees at the foot of the cross that a little wind would bring him the perfumed scent of what Mary had done.

So we see now a nation where a large percentage, and this election will show if it is the larger part of the electorate, will vote with the idea of a political rescue by their Messiah, to deliver them from the oppressive hand of conservatives, Christians, and a few Jews that still believe. They will betray the purpose of God for a few pieces of silver, for a financial rescue, for robbing the productive to pay for votes. All done with a slathered on excuse of “this is for the poor, this is for the afflicted. (It is for the children, don’t you know?) All done through a messiah that sat in a church with satanically inspired teachings, a “political,” church; all done by placing hope in a man that made his bargain with the Devil a long time ago. Know this America, God cannot be used by anyone, your prayers for false hope will not be answered but will be the trigger to destroy this false hope, to destroy this deception that God is here to deliver you from reality. The Christians will not be raptured, and the liberals will not be saved by government. We will all get to face the judgments coming on the earth now. And only those that discern the true intent of God, and worship only Him will be protected from the satanic wrath to come.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

The Three Ages of Man (Part 3)

As the second coming of the Lord is upon the earth we see changes that first appear in our culture, in science and knowledge, and in the decay of the governments of man, as must happen as the government of God is replacing the government of man. The coming of the Lord is a great event that throws its shadow upon all humanity. This time period began around WWI, in that the prophecy of Daniel is completed as the time of the Gentiles has come to an end. Now Daniel’s vision revealed the Gentile Kingdoms from Babylon through Media-Persia, then Greece, then Rome. The remnants of the Roman Empire came crashing down in 1914 with the start of WWI.

All the maps of Europe are redrawn, the Hapsburg dynasty comes to an end, and strange freakish governments come upon the earth (communism). Communism, socialism, fascism are manifestations of the beast that devours the woman riding upon it. Communism literally devoured the false church, especially the Orthodox, Greek and Russian Church. Socialism and fascism has done in the rest of the Catholic (western) church in Europe. Their churches are dead and empty…Islam moves into the vacuum.

It is interesting to note that Jerusalem was conquered by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC, the Jewish nation and the first temple is destroyed. A remnant of the Jews returns under the Persian King Cyrus and rebuilds the temple, but it is nothing in comparison to Solomon’s temple. More importantly the Jews are never again a sovereign nation until 1948, the only nation in history that has come back into existence after it was destroyed, as well as the revival of a dead language (Hebrew), why humanity does not take special note of this fact is beyond me, maybe they do since under demonic influence most of the nations of the earth rail against Israel, and not a few seek its destruction.

Now 586 + 1914 = 2500, a very significant number as it represents 50 X 50. Fifty is the cycle of the Jubilee year in Israel. Mosaic Law dictated every seven years you gave the land rest and did not plant, a pretty enlightened and scientific knowledge for the times as the land would recover and regenerate if you rested it one year in seven. Now every seventh sabbatical year was a year of Jubilee, it would fall every 49 years and extend to the 50th year. That was a special sabbatical year in that all property returned to the original families and all debt was forgiven, and slaves are set free.

Once again an incredibly enlightened system that kept the rich from getting extraordinarily rich, and the poor from remaining always poor. Acquisition of power and land could only go on for 50 years, and then everything had to revert back to original inheritance. America could use such a system to combat the current greed that has caused such financial distress, and created our own oligarchy.

In 1914 the gentile powers were broken, and that breaking and smashing continues, the Balfour declaration set into motion the re-creation of the nation of Israel, and in this same time period the church was experiencing the outpourings of the Holy Spirit, something that had been going on here and there for 80 years, but in the early 1900’s you have tremendous outpourings of the Holy Spirit all over the world, the famous Azusa Street outpourings in Los Angeles were part of that movement. God was restoring His original Church at the same time He is restoring His original nation.

During this time we see the advent of technologies that enable global communication (certainly a prerequisite for a universal kingdom under God). We see the release of electronic knowledge, quantum physics, molecular biology, advanced transportation, conquring of infectious disease, these sciences will be used to help create the conditions of the Kingdom of God, such as changing the nature of animals (Lion will lay down with the lamb), of longevity (men shall live as long as trees, and anyone that dies before a hundred years old will be thought to be accursed). Even great prophetic power is foretold in the governance of man, in those nations that do not obey, the prophets can stop rain upon that nation. Of course right now we see these sciences used for both good and evil. But remember the printing press was originally used to promulgate the Bible. It is man that perverts the usage of science.

It is to the issue of man becoming beings that are centered in their spirits, not our souls or the physical that this 3rd age of God’s dealings with man is focused. As such we are also witnessing the last great outburst of soulish man, almost like a cosmic temper tantrum of many who do not want to grow up. ( I have always considered the Dem party to be the party of Peter Pan). To understand a liberal is to understand a person that refuses to go through the personal pain and confrontation from God about themselves. A truly spiritual person is incredibly humble, because they have discovered what a wretch they are or can be, or have been.

You discover this in your relationships with wife or husband. Men have to re-walk back to the Garden of Eden where Adam blamed his wife for his fall, and then blamed God for giving him Eve. That is the expression of the Adamic nature in men, to blame the woman (for interfering with his relationship with God). Grow up Adam, YOU betrayed God and YOU betrayed your wife. The Adamic nature in a woman is that which is easily deceived by other voices, and is too self-focused and vain. Grow up Eve…get your eyes off the fruit you are not supposed to eat, stop dragging your man into a materialistic life.

The rise of homosexuality at this time is a way for man or woman to avoid becoming spiritual, the greatest channel to mature a person (that is willing) is marriage to the opposite sex. We complement and confront one another in our natures. Homosexuals divert this purpose, it is not the sex that is the sin; it is the rejection of the method of God, the mechanism of God to provoking a human being to mature and become a spiritually oriented person. God will not fool with this beyond a certain limit, refer to Sodom and Gomorrah. If you never marry God is faithful to provide channels to you for that maturing, some people are not meant to be married.

A spiritual person lives for something greater than themselves or immediate gratification. A spiritual person learns to love, that’s right, learns to love, no matter how lovable you think you are true spiritual love is learned and only comes by suffering for others. That is why the cry of liberals about the war in Iraq is now something evil, because no matter what reasons they give, that war is essentially a duty upon Christians, and Jews actually, or those raised under that ethic to fight and maybe even die for the freedom of others that DO NOT LOVE YOU. There can hardly be anything as unlovable as Muslims destroyed under their satanic religion. But they have no chance if somebody from outside that system does not suffer, and shed blood for their freedom.

I still cry to this day when I remember that video of the young marine dancing on top of the Humvee for some little awe-struck Iraqi kids. Just that simple act, just loving those little kids, trying to make them laugh. Or of the story of crying Marines as they liberated little kids from one of Saddam’s political prisons, many carrying the tortured and starved little kids over to their crying, yet overjoyed parents. If you are not moved by this, then you may be beyond hope or understanding. There has to be something there that God can start to work with, you may be damaging that part of you beyond recovery if you are consumed by political hatreds and doctrines. Remember Judas was a person focused on the political, he wanted to bend Jesus to his desire to kill the Romans…that did not work out too well.

Certainly the Jews are under this condition, and actually were there before us, dying by the hand of hateful Arabs and Muslims. How many Jews in order to stay sane had to learn to forgive from a divine level, after seeing their loved ones blown up on busses, in pizza parlors, in airplanes and cruise ships? The world yawned, America forced unrighteous negotiations upon Israel.

Then 911, we get to join the suffering, we get to join the war…or ELSE!

This did not go as I thought, I have more to add to this but we will do that in another post.